Skip to content

Minimum requirement for a circuit #110

Answered by gbotrel
fosgate29 asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi, indeed this popped up before, and this should throw a clean error message ( #112 ).

A circuit that has no computational constraints make little sense (do you have something we missed in mind? ) --> it means the proof is stating something like x == y and to verify the proof, one must supply... y.

Note that some assertions (like AssertIsLessOrEqual) will add computational constraints. AssertIsEqual does not.

Replies: 1 comment 3 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
3 replies
@fosgate29
Comment options

@fosgate29
Comment options

@fosgate29
Comment options

Answer selected by fosgate29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants