|
| 1 | +# Code example for a Quantum Boltzmann Machine (QBM) applied to a binary classification problem using PennyLane. This example uses a simplified dataset (XOR problem) and trains a parameterized quantum circuit to model the joint distribution of features and labels. |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +import pennylane as qml |
| 4 | +from pennylane import numpy as np |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +# Define the target probabilities for the XOR dataset |
| 7 | +target_probs = np.zeros(8) |
| 8 | +target_indices = [0, 3, 5, 6] # Binary: 000, 011, 101, 110 |
| 9 | +for idx in target_indices: |
| 10 | + target_probs[idx] = 0.25 |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +# Quantum circuit configuration |
| 13 | +num_qubits = 3 # 2 features + 1 label |
| 14 | +dev = qml.device("default.qubit", wires=num_qubits) |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +@qml.qnode(dev) |
| 17 | +def circuit(params): |
| 18 | + # First rotation layer |
| 19 | + for i in range(num_qubits): |
| 20 | + qml.RX(params[0][i], wires=i) |
| 21 | + qml.RY(params[1][i], wires=i) |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | + # Entangling gates |
| 24 | + qml.CNOT(wires=[0, 1]) |
| 25 | + qml.CNOT(wires=[1, 2]) |
| 26 | + qml.CNOT(wires=[0, 2]) |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | + # Second rotation layer |
| 29 | + for i in range(num_qubits): |
| 30 | + qml.RX(params[2][i], wires=i) |
| 31 | + qml.RY(params[3][i], wires=i) |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | + return qml.probs(wires=range(num_qubits)) |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +# Initialize parameters |
| 36 | +params = [ |
| 37 | + np.random.uniform(0, 2*np.pi, size=num_qubits, requires_grad=True), |
| 38 | + np.random.uniform(0, 2*np.pi, size=num_qubits, requires_grad=True), |
| 39 | + np.random.uniform(0, 2*np.pi, size=num_qubits, requires_grad=True), |
| 40 | + np.random.uniform(0, 2*np.pi, size=num_qubits, requires_grad=True) |
| 41 | +] |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +# Cost function (KL divergence) |
| 44 | +def cost(params): |
| 45 | + model_probs = circuit(params) |
| 46 | + cost = 0.0 |
| 47 | + for idx in target_indices: |
| 48 | + q = model_probs[idx] |
| 49 | + cost += 0.25 * (np.log(0.25) - np.log(q + 1e-10)) # Add small epsilon to avoid log(0) |
| 50 | + return cost |
| 51 | + |
| 52 | +# Optimization |
| 53 | +opt = qml.AdamOptimizer(stepsize=0.1) |
| 54 | +max_iterations = 100 |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +for i in range(max_iterations): |
| 57 | + params, current_cost = opt.step_and_cost(cost, params) |
| 58 | + if i % 10 == 0: |
| 59 | + print(f"Iteration {i+1}: Cost = {current_cost}") |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +# Prediction function |
| 62 | +def predict(features): |
| 63 | + # Calculate probabilities for both possible labels |
| 64 | + all_probs = circuit(params) |
| 65 | + feature_mask = (int(f"{features[0]}{features[1]}", 2) << 1) |
| 66 | + p0 = all_probs[feature_mask] |
| 67 | + p1 = all_probs[feature_mask | 1] |
| 68 | + total = p0 + p1 |
| 69 | + return p0/total if total != 0 else 0.5, p1/total if total != 0 else 0.5 |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +# Test the model |
| 72 | +test_cases = [(0,0), (0,1), (1,0), (1,1)] |
| 73 | +print("\nPredictions:") |
| 74 | +for features in test_cases: |
| 75 | + prob_0, prob_1 = predict(features) |
| 76 | + print(f"Features {features}: P(0)={prob_0:.2f}, P(1)={prob_1:.2f}") |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | +""" |
| 79 | +**Key components explained:** |
| 80 | +
|
| 81 | +1. **Dataset**: Uses XOR problem with binary features and labels encoded in 3 qubits (2 features, 1 label). |
| 82 | +
|
| 83 | +2. **Quantum Circuit**: |
| 84 | + - Uses rotation gates (RX, RY) and entangling gates (CNOT) |
| 85 | + - Parameters are optimized to match the target distribution |
| 86 | + - Outputs probabilities for all possible 8 states |
| 87 | +
|
| 88 | +3. **Training**: |
| 89 | + - Minimizes KL divergence between model and target probabilities |
| 90 | + - Uses Adam optimizer for better convergence |
| 91 | +
|
| 92 | +4. **Prediction**: |
| 93 | + - Calculates conditional probabilities p(label|features) by marginalizing the joint distribution |
| 94 | + - Normalizes probabilities for classification |
| 95 | +
|
| 96 | +**Note:** This is a simplified example. For real-world applications, you would need to: |
| 97 | +1. Handle continuous features (e.g., using amplitude encoding) |
| 98 | +2. Use more sophisticated ansatz architectures |
| 99 | +3. Implement proper batching for larger datasets |
| 100 | +4. Add regularization to prevent overfitting |
| 101 | +
|
| 102 | +The output should show decreasing cost during training and high probabilities for correct labels in predictions. Actual results may vary due to random initialization and optimization challenges. |
| 103 | +""" |
0 commit comments