|
43 | 43 | ('Readings', 2, None, 'readings'), |
44 | 44 | ('Gates, the whys and hows', 2, None, 'gates-the-whys-and-hows'), |
45 | 45 | ('Structure of the lecture', 2, None, 'structure-of-the-lecture'), |
| 46 | + ('Reminder on density matrices and traces', |
| 47 | + 2, |
| 48 | + None, |
| 49 | + 'reminder-on-density-matrices-and-traces'), |
| 50 | + ('Definition of density matrix', |
| 51 | + 2, |
| 52 | + None, |
| 53 | + 'definition-of-density-matrix'), |
| 54 | + ('Von Neumann entropy', 2, None, 'von-neumann-entropy'), |
| 55 | + ('Schmidt decomposition', 2, None, 'schmidt-decomposition'), |
| 56 | + ('Pure states and Schmidt decomposition', |
| 57 | + 2, |
| 58 | + None, |
| 59 | + 'pure-states-and-schmidt-decomposition'), |
| 60 | + ('Proof of Schmidt decomposition', |
| 61 | + 2, |
| 62 | + None, |
| 63 | + 'proof-of-schmidt-decomposition'), |
| 64 | + ('Further parts of proof', 2, None, 'further-parts-of-proof'), |
| 65 | + ('SVD parts in proof', 2, None, 'svd-parts-in-proof'), |
| 66 | + ('Slight rewrite', 2, None, 'slight-rewrite'), |
| 67 | + ('Different dimensionalities', |
| 68 | + 2, |
| 69 | + None, |
| 70 | + 'different-dimensionalities'), |
46 | 71 | ('Part 1: Mathematical background', |
47 | 72 | 2, |
48 | 73 | None, |
|
197 | 222 | <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#readings" style="font-size: 80%;">Readings</a></li> |
198 | 223 | <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#gates-the-whys-and-hows" style="font-size: 80%;">Gates, the whys and hows</a></li> |
199 | 224 | <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#structure-of-the-lecture" style="font-size: 80%;">Structure of the lecture</a></li> |
| 225 | + <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#reminder-on-density-matrices-and-traces" style="font-size: 80%;">Reminder on density matrices and traces</a></li> |
| 226 | + <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#definition-of-density-matrix" style="font-size: 80%;">Definition of density matrix</a></li> |
| 227 | + <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#von-neumann-entropy" style="font-size: 80%;">Von Neumann entropy</a></li> |
| 228 | + <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#schmidt-decomposition" style="font-size: 80%;">Schmidt decomposition</a></li> |
| 229 | + <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#pure-states-and-schmidt-decomposition" style="font-size: 80%;">Pure states and Schmidt decomposition</a></li> |
| 230 | + <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#proof-of-schmidt-decomposition" style="font-size: 80%;">Proof of Schmidt decomposition</a></li> |
| 231 | + <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#further-parts-of-proof" style="font-size: 80%;">Further parts of proof</a></li> |
| 232 | + <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#svd-parts-in-proof" style="font-size: 80%;">SVD parts in proof</a></li> |
| 233 | + <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#slight-rewrite" style="font-size: 80%;">Slight rewrite</a></li> |
| 234 | + <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#different-dimensionalities" style="font-size: 80%;">Different dimensionalities</a></li> |
200 | 235 | <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#part-1-mathematical-background" style="font-size: 80%;">Part 1: Mathematical background</a></li> |
201 | 236 | <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#unitary-transformation" style="font-size: 80%;">Unitary transformation</a></li> |
202 | 237 | <!-- navigation toc: --> <li><a href="#interaction-picture" style="font-size: 80%;">Interaction picture</a></li> |
@@ -330,10 +365,181 @@ <h2 id="gates-the-whys-and-hows" class="anchor">Gates, the whys and hows </h2> |
330 | 365 | <h2 id="structure-of-the-lecture" class="anchor">Structure of the lecture </h2> |
331 | 366 |
|
332 | 367 | <ol> |
333 | | -<li> First we review some of the basic ways of representing the solution to the Schrödinger equation, introducing the so-called Interaction, Heisenberg and Schrödinger prictures and unitary transformations. This part is meant mainly as background material</li> |
| 368 | +<li> The first part is a reminder from last week</li> |
| 369 | +<li> Thereafter we review some of the basic ways of representing the solution to the Schrödinger equation, introducing the so-called Interaction, Heisenberg and Schrödinger prictures and unitary transformations. This part is meant mainly as background material</li> |
334 | 370 | <li> Secondly, we present examples of physical processes and how they can be represented as unitary operations on a given state.</li> |
335 | 371 | <li> These unitary transformations are then represented as gates. Setting gates together gives us a final circuit which can represent a specific physical system</li> |
336 | 372 | </ol> |
| 373 | +<!-- !split --> |
| 374 | +<h2 id="reminder-on-density-matrices-and-traces" class="anchor">Reminder on density matrices and traces </h2> |
| 375 | + |
| 376 | +<p>We have the spectral decomposition of a given operator \( \boldsymbol{A} \) given by</p> |
| 377 | + |
| 378 | +$$ |
| 379 | +\boldsymbol{A}=\sum_i\lambda_i\vert i \rangle\langle i\vert, |
| 380 | +$$ |
| 381 | + |
| 382 | +<p>with the ONB \( \vert i\rangle \) being eigenvectors of \( \boldsymbol{A} \) and \( \lambda_i \) being the eigenvalues. Similarly, a operator which is a function of \( \boldsymbol{A} \) is given by</p> |
| 383 | +$$ |
| 384 | +f(\boldsymbol{A})=\sum_if(\boldsymbol{A})\vert i \rangle\langle i\vert. |
| 385 | +$$ |
| 386 | + |
| 387 | +<p>The trace of a product of matrices is cyclic, that is</p> |
| 388 | +$$ |
| 389 | +\mathrm{tr}[\boldsymbol{ABC}])=\mathrm{tr}[\boldsymbol{BCA}])=\mathrm{tr}[\boldsymbol{CBA}]), |
| 390 | +$$ |
| 391 | + |
| 392 | +<p>and we have also </p> |
| 393 | +$$ |
| 394 | +\mathrm{tr}[\boldsymbol{A}\vert \psi\rangle\langle\psi\vert])=\langle\psi\vert\boldsymbol{A}\vert\psi\rangle. |
| 395 | +$$ |
| 396 | + |
| 397 | + |
| 398 | +<!-- !split --> |
| 399 | +<h2 id="definition-of-density-matrix" class="anchor">Definition of density matrix </h2> |
| 400 | + |
| 401 | +<p>Using the spectral decomposition we defined also the density matrix as</p> |
| 402 | +$$ |
| 403 | +\rho = \sum_i p_i\vert i \rangle\langle i\vert, |
| 404 | +$$ |
| 405 | + |
| 406 | +<p>where the probability \( p_i \) are the eigenvalues of the density linked with the ONB \( \vert i \rangle \).</p> |
| 407 | + |
| 408 | +<p>The trace of the density matrix is \( \mathrm{tr}\rho=1 \) and it is invariant under unitary transformations |
| 409 | +\( \vert \psi_i'\rangle = \boldsymbol{U}\vert \psi_i\rangle \). |
| 410 | +The unitary transformation of the density matrix gives, with |
| 411 | +\( \boldsymbol{U}^{\dagger}\boldsymbol{U}=\boldsymbol{U}^{T}\boldsymbol{U}=\boldsymbol{I} \), |
| 412 | +</p> |
| 413 | +$$ |
| 414 | +\boldsymbol{U}\rho\boldsymbol{U}^{\dagger}=\sum_ipi_i\boldsymbol{U}\vert \psi_i\rangle\langle\psi_i\vert\boldsymbol{U}^{\dagger}, |
| 415 | +$$ |
| 416 | + |
| 417 | +<p>and with the unitary transformation it is easy to show that thet trace of the transformaed density matrix is equal to one,</p> |
| 418 | +$$ |
| 419 | +\mathrm{tr}\left[ \boldsymbol{U}\rho\boldsymbol{U}^{\dagger}\right]=\mathrm{tr}\left[ \boldsymbol{U}\boldsymbol{U}^{\dagger}\rho\right]=1. |
| 420 | +$$ |
| 421 | + |
| 422 | + |
| 423 | +<!-- !split --> |
| 424 | +<h2 id="von-neumann-entropy" class="anchor">Von Neumann entropy </h2> |
| 425 | + |
| 426 | +<p>Using the density matrix \( \rho \), we define the quantum mechanical equivalent of the classical entropy as </p> |
| 427 | +$$ |
| 428 | +S=-\mathrm{Tr}[\rho\log_2{\rho}]. |
| 429 | +$$ |
| 430 | + |
| 431 | +<p>This is the so-called Von Neumann entropy. </p> |
| 432 | + |
| 433 | +<!-- !split --> |
| 434 | +<h2 id="schmidt-decomposition" class="anchor">Schmidt decomposition </h2> |
| 435 | + |
| 436 | +<p>A way to study entanglement is through the so-called Schmidt decomposition, |
| 437 | +which is essentially an application of the |
| 438 | +singular-value decomposition. |
| 439 | +</p> |
| 440 | + |
| 441 | +<!-- !split --> |
| 442 | +<h2 id="pure-states-and-schmidt-decomposition" class="anchor">Pure states and Schmidt decomposition </h2> |
| 443 | + |
| 444 | +<p>The Schmidt decomposition allows us to define a pure state in a |
| 445 | +bipartite Hilbert space composed of systems \( A \) and \( B \) as |
| 446 | +</p> |
| 447 | + |
| 448 | +$$ |
| 449 | +\vert\psi\rangle=\sum_{i=0}^{d-1}\sigma_i\vert i\rangle_A\vert i\rangle_B, |
| 450 | +$$ |
| 451 | + |
| 452 | +<p>where the amplitudes \( \sigma_i \) are real and positive and their |
| 453 | +squared values sum up to one, \( \sum_i\sigma_i^2=1 \). The states \( \vert |
| 454 | +i\rangle_A \) and \( \vert i\rangle_B \) form orthornormal bases for systems |
| 455 | +\( A \) and \( B \) respectively, the amplitudes \( \lambda_i \) are the so-called |
| 456 | +Schmidt coefficients and the Schmidt rank \( d \) is equal to the number |
| 457 | +of Schmidt coefficients and is smaller or equal to the minimum |
| 458 | +dimensionality of system \( A \) and system \( B \), that is \( d\leq |
| 459 | +\mathrm{min}(\mathrm{dim}(A), \mathrm{dim}(B)) \). |
| 460 | +</p> |
| 461 | + |
| 462 | +<!-- !split --> |
| 463 | +<h2 id="proof-of-schmidt-decomposition" class="anchor">Proof of Schmidt decomposition </h2> |
| 464 | + |
| 465 | +<p>The proof for the above decomposition is based on the singular-value |
| 466 | +decomposition. To see this, assume that we have two orthonormal bases |
| 467 | +sets for systems \( A \) and \( B \), respectively. That is we have two ONBs |
| 468 | +\( \vert i\rangle_A \) and \( \vert j\rangle_B \). We can always construct a |
| 469 | +product state (a pure state) as |
| 470 | +</p> |
| 471 | + |
| 472 | +$$ \vert\psi \rangle = \sum_{ij} c_{ij}\vert i\rangle_A\vert |
| 473 | +j\rangle_B, |
| 474 | +$$ |
| 475 | + |
| 476 | +<p>where the coefficients \( c_{ij} \) are the overlap coefficients which |
| 477 | +belong to a matrix \( \boldsymbol{C} \). |
| 478 | +</p> |
| 479 | + |
| 480 | +<!-- !split --> |
| 481 | +<h2 id="further-parts-of-proof" class="anchor">Further parts of proof </h2> |
| 482 | + |
| 483 | +<p>If we now assume that the |
| 484 | +dimensionalities of the two subsystems \( A \) and \( B \) are the same \( d \), |
| 485 | +we can always rewrite the matrix \( \boldsymbol{C} \) in terms of a singular-value |
| 486 | +decomposition with unitary/orthogonal matrices \( \boldsymbol{U} \) and \( \boldsymbol{V} \) |
| 487 | +of dimension \( d\times d \) and a matrix \( \boldsymbol{\Sigma} \) which contains the |
| 488 | +(diagonal) singular values \( 0\leq \sigma_0\leq \sigma_1 \leq \dots \sigma_{d-1} \) as |
| 489 | +</p> |
| 490 | + |
| 491 | +$$ |
| 492 | +\boldsymbol{C}=\boldsymbol{U}\boldsymbol{\Sigma}\boldsymbol{V}^{\dagger}. |
| 493 | +$$ |
| 494 | + |
| 495 | +<p>Note that the singular values can organized either as a descending series or as an ascending series.</p> |
| 496 | +<!-- !split --> |
| 497 | +<h2 id="svd-parts-in-proof" class="anchor">SVD parts in proof </h2> |
| 498 | + |
| 499 | +<p>This means we can rewrite the coefficients \( c_{ij} \) in terms of the singular-value decomposition</p> |
| 500 | +$$ |
| 501 | +c_{ij}=\sum_k u_{ik}\sigma_kv_{kj}, |
| 502 | +$$ |
| 503 | + |
| 504 | +<p>and inserting this in the definition of the pure state \( \vert \psi\rangle \) we have</p> |
| 505 | + |
| 506 | +$$ |
| 507 | +\vert\psi \rangle = \sum_{ij} \left(\sum_k u_{ik}\sigma_kv_{kj} \right)\vert i\rangle_A\vert j\rangle_B. |
| 508 | +$$ |
| 509 | + |
| 510 | + |
| 511 | +<!-- !split --> |
| 512 | +<h2 id="slight-rewrite" class="anchor">Slight rewrite </h2> |
| 513 | +<p>We rewrite the last equation as</p> |
| 514 | + |
| 515 | +$$ |
| 516 | +\vert\psi \rangle = \sum_{k}\sigma_k \left(\sum_i u_{ik}\vert i\rangle_A\right)\otimes\left(\sum_jv_{kj}\vert j\rangle_B\right), |
| 517 | +$$ |
| 518 | + |
| 519 | +<p>which we identify simply as, since the matrices \( \boldsymbol{U} \) and \( \boldsymbol{V} \) represent unitary transformations,</p> |
| 520 | +$$ |
| 521 | +\vert\psi \rangle = \sum_{k}\sigma_k \vert k\rangle_A\vert k\rangle_B. |
| 522 | +$$ |
| 523 | + |
| 524 | + |
| 525 | +<!-- !split --> |
| 526 | +<h2 id="different-dimensionalities" class="anchor">Different dimensionalities </h2> |
| 527 | + |
| 528 | +<p>It is straight forward to prove this relation in case systems \( A \) and |
| 529 | +\( B \) have different dimensionalities. Once we know the Schmidt |
| 530 | +decomposition of a state, we can immmediately say whether it is |
| 531 | +entangled or not. If a state \( \psi \) is entangled, then its Schmidt |
| 532 | +decomposition has more than one term. Stated differently, the state is |
| 533 | +entangled if the so-called Schmidt rank is greater than one. |
| 534 | +</p> |
| 535 | + |
| 536 | +<p>There |
| 537 | +is another important property of the Schmidt decomposition which is |
| 538 | +related to the properties of the density matrices and their trace |
| 539 | +operations and the entropies. These concepts can be studied for example |
| 540 | +by studying the two-qubit Hamiltonian described above. |
| 541 | +</p> |
| 542 | + |
337 | 543 | <!-- !split --> |
338 | 544 | <h2 id="part-1-mathematical-background" class="anchor">Part 1: Mathematical background </h2> |
339 | 545 |
|
@@ -1492,6 +1698,7 @@ <h2 id="measurement-basis" class="anchor">Measurement basis </h2> |
1492 | 1698 | X=HZH. |
1493 | 1699 | $$ |
1494 | 1700 |
|
| 1701 | + |
1495 | 1702 | <!-- ------------------- end of main content --------------- --> |
1496 | 1703 | </div> <!-- end container --> |
1497 | 1704 | <!-- include javascript, jQuery *first* --> |
|
0 commit comments