Individual Review Ticket

[nikhilc3]

Individuals	Team+Indi+Teacher	Runtime	Issues	Key Commit(s)	Analytics
Nikhil		LocalHost	Review Ticket Video	swimming Finished Sorting fully finished Fibo Fully finished Track Finished	Analytics

[kaiden-dough]

Individual Review "Kaiden" grading "Nikhil"

• [0.9] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [0.8] Video, includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
• [0.8] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
• [0.9] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions
• [0.8] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks

Per check.
0.55 not attempted/no check
0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime
0.8 mastery and runtime
0.9 above and beyond.

Freeform comment.
Provide positivies and growth summary.
Justify or comment on final score.
Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.

This work is very good. He did do a lot of the backend but one thing I would change is perhaps do more work throughout rather than just before the due date or commit throughout than rather the final date. Another thing would be that the video was thorough and was in the limit. Final score is 4.2/5.0. First check is 0.9 because he contributed to a lot of the sorting algorithms as well as the fibonacci algorithms to make a cool track and swimming visual to represent the time complexities. Fourth check is 0.9 because he had very monumental commits in the backend like the majority of the backend. Total is 3.9/5