We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We should add some of the functionality of tool openrpc validate into the test suite itself.
tool openrpc validate
Should probably do this after the test is run, or dump logs and allow the user to run as a separate step.
forest-tool shed openrpc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Guillaume: (probably) everything from API compare to here
Sorry, something went wrong.
@elmattic As discussed, we should perhaps focus on the openrpc validation exclusively, so that we can get this out the door.
Would it make sense to reformulate this issue, or throw it out and start again?
Indeed, let's close this. Openrpc spec validation is now happening in #57.
elmattic
No branches or pull requests
We should add some of the functionality of
tool openrpc validate
into the test suite itself.Should probably do this after the test is run, or dump logs and allow the user to run as a separate step.
forest-tool shed openrpc
with deterministic output. #52forest-tool shed openrpc
(including pattern, range, length, and array constraints). #53The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: