You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
just wanted to get your opinion on the 'robustness/validity' on this approach:
If we take the Phenotype .obs as input for cc.pl.diff_nhood_enrichment instead of the neighborhood column, are we essentially doing a classic co-localization/interaction analysis? What do you think, is the function suited for that or are there any caveats that might be problematic? Because your function is so handy for comparing cohorts, I would love to also try it on phenotype labels.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey @marcovarrone,
just wanted to get your opinion on the 'robustness/validity' on this approach:
If we take the Phenotype .obs as input for
cc.pl.diff_nhood_enrichmentinstead of the neighborhood column, are we essentially doing a classic co-localization/interaction analysis? What do you think, is the function suited for that or are there any caveats that might be problematic? Because your function is so handy for comparing cohorts, I would love to also try it on phenotype labels.Best,
Lukas
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions