You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Absolutely. I agree. I think it should be carefully planned, even discussing with a UX personnel or at least an experienced front-end dev.
Keep this in mind:
How should mquery used in your opinion
Should it used mostly via API or from the website
Should it be used for hunting? For testing?
How familiar is the user with the dataset?
The table can be expanded with more metadata about the samples
Hash(es), mime type, size, VT detection rate, MWDB link
Is it the desired outcome at all? Or do you want it to only be limited to hash+matched rule(s)
How useful is the query textarea after a query is executed? should it be collapsed maybe, to free more screen space? Can be un-collapsed upon demand
Should you even invest time in MQuery's front end? Maybe it can be narrowed to a simple one, as it is now, and let MWDB integration provide the rich tables, the filtering, the metadata (hashes, mime types, size, more labels)
Description
Right now, results view is pretty basic. Since it's one of the most important views in the system, we should work on improving it
Required Features
We should also consider making the query-view and results-view separate subpages (querying and looking at the results are different use-cases)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: