Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[META] Results view improvements #82

Open
6 of 7 tasks
msm-code opened this issue Apr 10, 2020 · 1 comment
Open
6 of 7 tasks

[META] Results view improvements #82

msm-code opened this issue Apr 10, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@msm-code
Copy link
Contributor

msm-code commented Apr 10, 2020

Description
Right now, results view is pretty basic. Since it's one of the most important views in the system, we should work on improving it

Required Features

We should also consider making the query-view and results-view separate subpages (querying and looking at the results are different use-cases)

@msm-code msm-code pinned this issue Apr 10, 2020
@msm-code
Copy link
Contributor Author

Copying this nice writeup by @ITAYC0HEN here (source: #78 (comment)):

Absolutely. I agree. I think it should be carefully planned, even discussing with a UX personnel or at least an experienced front-end dev.

Keep this in mind:

  • How should mquery used in your opinion
    • Should it used mostly via API or from the website
    • Should it be used for hunting? For testing?
    • How familiar is the user with the dataset?
  • The table can be expanded with more metadata about the samples
    • Hash(es), mime type, size, VT detection rate, MWDB link
    • Is it the desired outcome at all? Or do you want it to only be limited to hash+matched rule(s)
  • How useful is the query textarea after a query is executed? should it be collapsed maybe, to free more screen space? Can be un-collapsed upon demand
  • Should you even invest time in MQuery's front end? Maybe it can be narrowed to a simple one, as it is now, and let MWDB integration provide the rich tables, the filtering, the metadata (hashes, mime types, size, more labels)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant