You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
By default dua some_dir reports a flat file hierarchy. However, it would be useful to generate a tree, but non-interactively. My use case is sharing a disk usage report with someone, which can't be done in interactive mode, and the current behaviour isn't informative enough.
I wonder if a --depth <int> flag could be added to the uninteractive command that allows a tree output? It should default to 1 which is the current behaviour.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the suggestion! It seems to me that PDU might be exactly what you want.
It's an auto-tree, essentially, and it's faster than dua as well.
However, I think the particular implementation suggested here seems like a good fit and nice to have, so let's keep it in case anyone comes along to implement it.
Thanks for the recommendation. This isn't a good reason, but we use dua in our HPC facility and for admin + docs reasons, it would be easier to have one tool that does both the interactive stuff and uninteractive reporting.
By default
dua some_dir
reports a flat file hierarchy. However, it would be useful to generate a tree, but non-interactively. My use case is sharing a disk usage report with someone, which can't be done in interactive mode, and the current behaviour isn't informative enough.I wonder if a
--depth <int>
flag could be added to the uninteractive command that allows a tree output? It should default to 1 which is the current behaviour.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: