Skip to content

Conversation

@austintolani
Copy link
Contributor

@austintolani austintolani commented Sep 22, 2022

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?

    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
      Fixing issue in existing version (x-ms-external should not be set for OperationStatus).
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
    These API versions already been deployed.

  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
    Swagger to be published ASAP.

  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @austintolani Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 22, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.9.7)] new version base version
    redis.json 2021-06-01(6346d5c) 2021-06-01(main)
    redis.json 2022-05-01(6346d5c) 2022-05-01(main)
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) new version base version
    package-2022-05 package-2022-05(6346d5c) package-2022-05(main)
    package-2021-06 package-2021-06(6346d5c) package-2021-06(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    R3021 - PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/CheckNameAvailability'
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L73
    R3021 - PathResourceTypeNameCamelCase Resource type naming must follow camel case. Path: '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.Cache/CheckNameAvailability'
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-05-01/redis.json#L73
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2423
    R4013 - IntegerTypeMustHaveFormat The integer type does not have a format, please add it.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-05-01/redis.json#L2425
    R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.Cache/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L37
    R4018 - OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.Cache/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2022-05-01/redis.json#L37
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'Sku' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L1842
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisCommonProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L1882
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisCreateProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2020
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisUpdateProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2063
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2078
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisCreateParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2161
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisUpdateParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2201
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisAccessKeys' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2222
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisFirewallRule' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2237
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisFirewallRuleProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2263
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisFirewallRuleListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2280
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2297
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisInstanceDetails' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2326
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2364
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisRegenerateKeyParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2381
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisRebootParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2401
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ExportRDBParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2431
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ImportRDBParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2452
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ScheduleEntry' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2471
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ScheduleEntries' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2509
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisPatchSchedule' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2526
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisPatchScheduleListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2549
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisForceRebootResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2566
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'RedisLinkedServer' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Cache/stable/2021-06-01/redis.json#L2576
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ServiceAPIReadinessTest.
    ️️✔️~[Staging] TrafficValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for ModelValidation.
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️SDK Track2 Validation succeeded [Detail]
    • The following tags are being changed in this PR
      • "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/6346d5cba6cc3d44fcca572cbbe63850ee2257ad/specification/redis/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2022-05">redis/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2022-05
      • "https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/6346d5cba6cc3d44fcca572cbbe63850ee2257ad/specification/redis/resource-manager/readme.md#tag-package-2021-06">redis/resource-manager/readme.md#package-2021-06
    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:
    Rule Message
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-05",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'ErrorDetail' (1 differences):\n - properties.details.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:249" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:461"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    "readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2022-05",
    "details":"Error: 1 errors occured -- cannot continue."
    PreCheck/DuplicateSchema "readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-06",
    "details":"Duplicate Schema named 'ErrorDetail' (1 differences):\n - properties.details.$ref: "#/components/schemas/schemas:247" => "#/components/schemas/schemas:459"; This error can be temporarily avoided by using the 'modelerfour.lenient-model-deduplication' setting. NOTE: This setting will be removed in a future version of @autorest/modelerfour; schemas should be updated to fix this issue sooner than that."
    "readme":"redis/resource-manager/readme.md",
    "tag":"package-2021-06",
    "details":"Error: 1 errors occured -- cannot continue."
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 22, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    azure-sdk-for-go - sdk/resourcemanager/redis/armredis - Approved - 3.0.0
    +	Struct `CommonProperties` has been removed
    +	Struct `CreateProperties` has been removed
    +	Struct `Properties` has been removed
    +	Struct `UpdateProperties` has been removed

    azure-sdk-for-js - @azure/arm-rediscache - 8.0.0
    +	Operation PatchSchedules.createOrUpdate has a new signature
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from be02f4e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.Redis [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from be02f4e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-redis [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Model RedisLinkedServerCreateParameters has a new parameter geo_replicated_primary_host_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model RedisLinkedServerCreateParameters has a new parameter primary_host_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model RedisLinkedServerCreateProperties has a new parameter geo_replicated_primary_host_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model RedisLinkedServerCreateProperties has a new parameter primary_host_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model RedisLinkedServerProperties has a new parameter geo_replicated_primary_host_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model RedisLinkedServerProperties has a new parameter primary_host_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model RedisLinkedServerWithProperties has a new parameter geo_replicated_primary_host_name
      info	[Changelog]   - Model RedisLinkedServerWithProperties has a new parameter primary_host_name
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from be02f4e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/redis/armredis [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `CommonProperties` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `CreateProperties` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `OperationStatus` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `Properties` has been removed
      info	[Changelog] - Struct `UpdateProperties` has been removed
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New field `PrimaryHostName` in struct `LinkedServerProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `GeoReplicatedPrimaryHostName` in struct `LinkedServerProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `GeoReplicatedPrimaryHostName` in struct `LinkedServerCreateProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `PrimaryHostName` in struct `LinkedServerCreateProperties`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 10 breaking change(s), 2 additive change(s).
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from be02f4e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-rediscache [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface RedisLinkedServerCreateParameters has a new optional parameter geoReplicatedPrimaryHostName
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface RedisLinkedServerCreateParameters has a new optional parameter primaryHostName
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface RedisLinkedServerCreateProperties has a new optional parameter geoReplicatedPrimaryHostName
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface RedisLinkedServerCreateProperties has a new optional parameter primaryHostName
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface RedisLinkedServerWithProperties has a new optional parameter geoReplicatedPrimaryHostName
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface RedisLinkedServerWithProperties has a new optional parameter primaryHostName
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] **Breaking Changes**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Operation PatchSchedules.createOrUpdate has a new signature
    ️⚠️ azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from be02f4e. Schema Automation 14.0.0
      command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
      cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm WARN old lockfile
      warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
    • ️✔️redis [View full logs
    ️️✔️ azure-powershell succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from be02f4e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️Az.Redis [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Sep 22, 2022

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/redis/armredis Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    Python track2_azure-mgmt-redis Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    Java azure-resourcemanager-redis-generated Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.Redis Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    JavaScript @azure/arm-rediscache Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

    @ghost ghost added the Redis Cache label Sep 22, 2022
    @austintolani austintolani reopened this Sep 22, 2022
    @austintolani austintolani reopened this Sep 22, 2022
    @AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager SuppressionReviewRequired labels Sep 22, 2022
    "$ref": "../../../../../common-types/resource-management/v3/types.json#/definitions/OperationStatusResult"
    }
    ],
    "x-ms-external": true
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Is there any reason to remove this?

    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    @akning-ms its inclusion is creating problems when generating our .NET SDK. It seems like it should have never been set in the first place.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    as it seems caused GO & JS breaking change. @tadelesh @qiaozha to confirm

    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    The Go breaking is from code generator and could be ignored.

    Copy link
    Member

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    @qiaozha is the JS breaking change OK also?

    @tadelesh tadelesh added the Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go label Sep 27, 2022
    @austintolani
    Copy link
    Contributor Author

    @akning-ms @tadelesh Thank you for reviewing this PR. Is there anything we need to do on our end to get this PR merged? Our .NET SDK release is dependent on these changes so we would like to get it merged ASAP.

    @akning-ms akning-ms merged commit be02f4e into Azure:main Oct 5, 2022
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Labels

    Approved-SdkBreakingChange-Go Approve the breaking change tracking for azure-sdk-for-go CI-BreakingChange-Go CI-BreakingChange-JavaScript ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test Redis Cache resource-manager

    Projects

    None yet

    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    5 participants