Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Site Editor - Insert from URL (Audio and Video blocks) too small #97328

Open
ktyfuller604 opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Site Editor - Insert from URL (Audio and Video blocks) too small #97328

ktyfuller604 opened this issue Dec 11, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
Customer Report Issues or PRs that were reported via Happiness. Previously known as "Happiness Request". [Feature] Full Site Editor The site editor. [Feature Group] Editor Experience Features related to Gutenberg integration on WordPress.com. [Platform] Atomic [Platform] Simple [Pri] Normal Schedule for the next available opportuinity. [Product] WordPress.com All features accessible on and related to WordPress.com. [Status] Needs Author Reply [Type] Bug

Comments

@ktyfuller604
Copy link

Quick summary

The Insert from URL field for Audio and Video blocks is too small. It only shows the Apply icon. This only happens in the Site Editor. The field is wide enough to add the URL in Pages or Posts.

Steps to reproduce

  1. Access the Site Editor
  2. Edit a page, post, template, etc
  3. Add an Audio or Video block
  4. Choose the "Insert from URL" option

What you expected to happen

The field should be large enough to enter the URL.

What actually happened

The field only has enough space to show the Apply icon.

Image

Impact

Some (< 50%)

Available workarounds?

Yes, easy to implement

If the above answer is "Yes...", outline the workaround.

Click in the white space just to the left of the Apply icon and past the URL. You won't see that it worked until you click Apply.

Or, for pages/posts, use the Page editor.

Platform (Simple and/or Atomic)

Simple, Atomic

Logs or notes

I tested in both Chrome and Safari, and the original report was on a simple site, but I could replicate it on an atomic site.

9144384-zd-a8c

@ktyfuller604 ktyfuller604 added [Feature Group] Editor Experience Features related to Gutenberg integration on WordPress.com. [Feature] Full Site Editor The site editor. [Product] WordPress.com All features accessible on and related to WordPress.com. [Type] Bug Needs triage Ticket needs to be triaged labels Dec 11, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added [Platform] Atomic [Platform] Simple [Pri] Low Address when resources are available. labels Dec 11, 2024
Copy link

Support References

This comment is automatically generated. Please do not edit it.

  • 9144384-zen

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Customer Report Issues or PRs that were reported via Happiness. Previously known as "Happiness Request". label Dec 11, 2024
@Robertght
Copy link

📌 REPRODUCTION RESULTS

  • Tested on Simple – Replicated
  • Tested on Atomic – Couldn't not replicate it
  • Replicable outside of Dotcom – No

📌 FINDINGS/SCREENSHOTS/VIDEO

  • I could only replicate this within the Templates section and only on the Simple sites.
  • The AT and self-hosted site did not reflect the same issue on pages, posts or templates, with or without Gutenberg active.

📌 ACTIONS

  • Triaged
  • Requested author feedback

📌 Message to Author
@ktyfuller604 Is there an AT site example where we can see the issue?

@Robertght Robertght moved this from Needs Triage to In Triage in Automattic Prioritization: The One Board ™ Dec 11, 2024
@Robertght Robertght added [Status] Needs Author Reply [Pri] Normal Schedule for the next available opportuinity. and removed Needs triage Ticket needs to be triaged [Pri] Low Address when resources are available. labels Dec 11, 2024
@ktyfuller604
Copy link
Author

@Robertght thanks for the ping!

I can replicate the issue on bebravetraveler.com (My AT site) using the craftfully theme.

@ramonjd
Copy link
Member

ramonjd commented Jan 6, 2025

This is a bug in Gutenberg and occurs on image blocks as well:

The block editor content CSS for the media placeholder isn't being loaded in the site editor, but it is in the post editor.

In Gutenberg trunk (19.9)

Post editor

Image

Site editor

Image

I created an issue here:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Customer Report Issues or PRs that were reported via Happiness. Previously known as "Happiness Request". [Feature] Full Site Editor The site editor. [Feature Group] Editor Experience Features related to Gutenberg integration on WordPress.com. [Platform] Atomic [Platform] Simple [Pri] Normal Schedule for the next available opportuinity. [Product] WordPress.com All features accessible on and related to WordPress.com. [Status] Needs Author Reply [Type] Bug
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants