Skip to content

Add Aegis Dashboard contributor evaluation policy #124

Description

@El-swaggerito

Description

Difficulty: Hard

Type: Documentation

Summary

Create a contributor evaluation policy for Aegis Dashboard issues.

Current Behaviour

Contributors may assume that merged PRs are automatically approved for payment.

Expected Behaviour

The repo should clearly state that GrantFox evaluation happens after merge and depends on quality, tests, CI, and issue completion.

Suggested Implementation

Add documentation explaining evaluation expectations, payment-period behaviour, self-review, and maintainer review standards.

Files or Areas Likely Affected

  • docs/
  • README.md
  • .github/
  • app/
  • src/
  • tests/
  • package.json

Acceptance Criteria

  • Policy states that merged PRs do not guarantee payment approval.
  • GrantFox evaluation process is referenced clearly.
  • Contributors are told not to spam community channels during payment periods.
  • Testing and CI expectations are included.
  • Acceptance criteria completion is included.
  • README links to the policy.

Additional Notes

This directly addresses contributor expectations before payment periods.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

GrantFox OSSIssue tracked for GrantFox OSS contributionMaybe RewardedIssue may be eligible for a GrantFox rewardOfficial Campaign | FWC26Official GrantFox campaign labelaegisAegis RWA Protocol related workdashboardDashboard and frontend workdeveloper-experienceDeveloper experience workdocumentationDocumentation workhardHard difficulty

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions