You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Issue:
We noticed an issue with the Redirect Manager, when redirect rows are created using the file import they are not published to the publisher when running the 'Publish Redirect Configurations' button.
We also noticed a difference between those created via file import and those created directly from the form:
When created via the file import, each redirect row has a jcr:primaryType of type sling:Folder
When created via the form, each redirect row has a jcr:primaryType of type nt:unstructured
This difference is causing an issue with the 'Publish Redirect Configurations', mainly on the JSP /apps/acs-commons/components/utilities/manage-redirects/replicate.POST.jsp, only the redirect rows created manually ( jcr:primaryType of type nt:unstructured) are replicated
2 possible solutions:
Update the code of /apps/acs-commons/components/utilities/manage-redirects/replicate.POST.jsp
Handle redirect rows created manually & with Excel import in the same way (meaning create redirect rows with jcr:primaryType=type nt:unstructured)
I think the last solution is cleaner.
I can provide a PR if my analysis is correct.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Technical Env:
Issue:
We noticed an issue with the Redirect Manager, when redirect rows are created using the file import they are not published to the publisher when running the 'Publish Redirect Configurations' button.
We also noticed a difference between those created via file import and those created directly from the form:
This difference is causing an issue with the 'Publish Redirect Configurations', mainly on the JSP /apps/acs-commons/components/utilities/manage-redirects/replicate.POST.jsp, only the redirect rows created manually ( jcr:primaryType of type nt:unstructured) are replicated
2 possible solutions:
I think the last solution is cleaner.
I can provide a PR if my analysis is correct.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: