Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Add bigger Co-Processors #102

Open
LuziferSenpai opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

[Feature Request] Add bigger Co-Processors #102

LuziferSenpai opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@LuziferSenpai
Copy link

LuziferSenpai commented Jan 17, 2024

Hey,

it would be awesome to get even bigger Co-Processors.

I would love the steps from crafting/storage cells.

Something like:
1 -> 4 -> 16 -> 64 -> 256 -> etc.

Why? It would save alot of space and we already have MASSIV crafting cpu's.

@62832
Copy link
Owner

62832 commented Jan 17, 2024

The API that allows for the 4x co-processor only goes as high as 16 co-processor threads per block. I hesitate to go any higher than 4 without a compellingly expensive recipe to boot.

@LuziferSenpai
Copy link
Author

Mhmm, I saw it in GregTech New Horizons, but it probably was a heavily modified version of AE.

@62832
Copy link
Owner

62832 commented Jan 17, 2024

Indeed, GTNH maintains its own fork of AE2 for 1.7.10.

@James103
Copy link

I hesitate to go any higher than 4 without a compellingly expensive recipe to boot

My idea for such a recipe would have one 16-core crafting co-processor unit cost four 4-core co-processor units, some netherite, and Accumulation Processors.

The "four 4x co-processor units" cost means this is a way to compact CPUs even further by recycling 4-core units into more compact 16-core units (since many large bases utilizing MEGA Cells will have large crafting CPUs with many 4-core co-processors), while the netherite and Accumulation Processors are meant to push the tech level for that compaction a bit further.

@AngelTechnic
Copy link

oh yeah i would definitely enjoy having a 16-core processing unit (maybe call it the Quantum Co-Processing Unit?) Even if we can't go above 16 in one block, that would still be a huge boost to efficiency.

as for making it suitably expensive, maybe something involving singularities would suffice? It would fit thematically (hence the name quantum) and singularities are kinda annoying to make.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants